The Gadgeteer Bulletin Board
  eHolster Case Review Comments
  eHolster Case Review Comments

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   eHolster Case Review Comments
Julie
Administrator

Posts: 2752
From: Columbus, IN USA
Registered: Feb 1999

posted 10-22-2000 09:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Julie   Click Here to Email Julie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Post your comments here on the eHolster Case Review.

http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/eholster-review.html

Just click the POST REPLY message on this page.

firstpost
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 12:04 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Imagine this:

You walk into a federal building wearing one of this e-holsters and carrying your pdas and cellphones, lets say under your coat, since you are in Chicago :-). You reach under your left arm to get your pda out, in order to walk through the metal detector gate. There is a 99% chance of all the guards have seen the Matrix, there will be n+1 guns pointed at you, before you even look up.

Not a good idea, unless of course you have a high life insurance on you, but even than it is somewhat unselfish...

Not A Geek
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 07:09 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, I actually hope someone would shoot me and put me out of my misery if I ever started wearing this kind of geek-wear!

PedroGringo
Junior Member

Posts: 6
From: Falls Church, VA USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 10-23-2000 08:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for PedroGringo   Click Here to Email PedroGringo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi My name is Peter and I'm a geek...

Sounds like a good intro to my next 12 step program. I used a holster for a while. It was really nice to carry both my Visor and my keyboard around with me. I found that it was a bit too geeky when I wasn't wearing something over it. When I had a vest or jacket over it, no-one noticed it.

I used Landware's burro pack which I just unclipped before getting in site of the security folks at any of the federal buildings I work in. I probably wouldn't use the e-holster because you can't easily unclip it without taking off your jacket.

It really is a geeky thing to wear and I don't use it as often as I used to. I'm actually looking for an alternative. I'm not really a belt clip kind of guy and I'd like to have a way to attach my Visor and stowaway keyboard without geeking out too badly.

Peace!

Peter

Jack Voss
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 10:26 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm thinking that the geek factor has been beaten to death. Not a lot left to say. I have a Grinder Gear nylon canvas bag on my belt for my Visor. So far, I haven't fielded any adverse comments. And, since I'm not carrying a gun, that may be a good sign for the Grinder crowd.

Kayak Jack
Doing what you like is FREEDOM
Liking what you do is HAPPINESS

gadgetman
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 01:45 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think I had heard of this thing before, but the picture made me laugh so hard, I cried!

If you carry that much stuff, use a shoulder bag or briefcase. If you want the military look, get an LBE with some pouches. You could even use a pistol holster to carry your cell phone or PDA!

gm

Jung
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 01:49 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I found the following statement presumptious :

"The PalmIIIc fit was a bit snug, so you may have some trouble getting bigger, less useful (i.e. WindowsCE/PocketPC) devices to fit."

Specifically "less useful" - to whom are these devices less useful? Can you make the judgement that they are less useful to everyone, even those you have never met?

lionkiller
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 03:48 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"larger, less useful"? Have you seen an iPAQ compared to a IIIc? The iPAQ is smaller and light years ahead of the Palm in terms of what it can do. Palm is an advanced electric organizer...Pocket PC's (though I hate to admit it as I am not a fan of Microsoft)are truly hand-held computers. And there you have my two cents worth...

TheCritic
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 09:15 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Remember his/her whole "Why I choosed the IIIC over the iPaq" Thing?
Of course what the reviewer has said was purely out of spite and jealousy.
I dont want to start a war( not yet, or this soon), but I think that Palm would be the "Bigger, Less Useful(IIIC, IIIxe, M100) devices"

Jung
unregistered
posted 10-23-2000 09:53 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Actually, I didn't have any problem with Julie's reasons for choosing the Palm IIIc over the iPaq. I thought her reviews so far have been unbias, and her reasons well explained.

The eHolster reviewer made it sounded like it was universally accepted that WindowsCE/PocketPC devices are less useful than Palms. May be he meant to state his personal opinion, but it did not read so.

nanagbiz
Member

Posts: 33
From: San Angelo, TX USA
Registered: Jun 99

posted 10-24-2000 08:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for nanagbiz   Click Here to Email nanagbiz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TheCritic:
Remember his/her whole "Why I choosed the IIIC over the iPaq" Thing?
Of course what the reviewer has said was purely out of spite and jealousy.
I dont want to start a war( not yet, or this soon), but I think that Palm would be the "Bigger, Less Useful(IIIC, IIIxe, M100) devices"

Hi Critic,
I just wanted to point out that this article was not written by Julie. SHE is the one that wrote the IIIc/iPAQ review that you are referring to. I am certain that her intention was never to start a "war", but to tell you her opinion, based on her experience - which is all any good reviewer can possibly do.
Thanks,
Judie Clark

Dan Parsons
unregistered
posted 10-26-2000 08:56 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am the author of this review... I said what I said because I honestly feel that CE is useless. There, you have it.

quote:
Originally posted by TheCritic:
Remember his/her whole "Why I choosed the IIIC over the iPaq" Thing?
Of course what the reviewer has said was purely out of spite and jealousy.
I dont want to start a war( not yet, or this soon), but I think that Palm would be the "Bigger, Less Useful(IIIC, IIIxe, M100) devices"

Q
Member

Posts: 337
From: Alexandria, VA USA
Registered: Aug 99

posted 10-26-2000 12:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Q     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dan Parsons:
I said what I said because I honestly feel that CE is useless.

It wasn't stated as your opinion in the review, though. That context wasn't expressed. That's people's beef.

TheCritic
unregistered
posted 10-28-2000 07:18 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
The eHolster reviewer made it sounded like it was universally accepted that WindowsCE/PocketPC devices are less useful than Palms. May be he meant to state his personal opinion, but it did not read so.

How is PPC worse than Palm. If anything is useless, Palms are

Julie
Administrator

Posts: 2752
From: Columbus, IN USA
Registered: Feb 1999

posted 10-28-2000 10:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Julie   Click Here to Email Julie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please use this topic to talk about the eHolster and not Palm vs PPC.
Thanks.

TheCritic
unregistered
posted 11-04-2000 12:41 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dan Parsons:
I am the author of this review... I said what I said because I honestly feel that CE is useless. There, you have it.



Idea- THEN WHY DOESNT THE REVIEWER KEEP ON THE TOPIC OF REVIEWING THE e-HOLSTER?

Ill go play on my bigger, less useful iPaq now. Ta Ta!

TheDreamer
Member

Posts: 10
From: Dublin, OH, USA
Registered: Mar 99

posted 12-03-2000 12:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for TheDreamer   Click Here to Email TheDreamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, I'm no stranger to using a holster to carry about a PDA. I started with a holster for my Newton MP130....and I did get lots of strange looks....I was living in Canada at the time. But, I never really had any trouble with it. Even when walking onto the nearby military base, I worked for a defence contractor.

Later (after moving to the US and getting a Palm III), I picked up the BurroPak....and while I got some strange reactions from people at work. I didn't encounter any resistance to having it. Including international air travel.

During the summer I switched to an e-Holster, because I liked the look and it seemed better suited to holding my growing collection of e-gadgets. I mainly wanted to move the cellphone (that I had at the time) off of my belt. There wasn't as much reaction to using the e-holster at work, probably because people have become accustom to seeing me with a holster of some kind.

Recently I just got back from a cruise of the Western Caribbean (Sea Princess). And, I didn't have any problems clearing security with the holster on. I wore the holster pretty much continuously the whole trip. I had one pouch for glasses and a pen and the neoprene pouch that I normally have my Palm Vx in....I used to carry around my Canon ELPH 370Z. Found it to be a perfect arrangement, better than having a camera dangling around my neck or other usual arrangements.

Sure I got lots of questions about it from passengers and cruise staff. One of the head waiters commented that he checked out information on the eHolster....don't know if he'll be getting one.....

------------------

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Gadgeteer

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e